AngusBeef.fyiAngus beef, explained for producers and buyers

Home / Grass-Fed & Regenerative Angus / Grass-Fed Production

Grass-Fed vs. Grain-Finished Angus: Fatty Acids

How finishing diet changes the fat in the ribeye muscle, and what the research does and does not support.

By the AngusBeef.fyi editors · 4 min read

The longissimus dorsi is the long muscle along the back that gives us ribeyes, strip steaks and much of the prime rib. Because it is the muscle most people think of when they picture a steak, it is also the one most often studied when researchers ask how production systems change beef. This article looks at what published work says about how grass and grain finishing alter the fatty acids in that muscle in Angus cattle, why the differences arise, and where the evidence thins out.

The Angus-specific study

A 2016 paper in Scientific Reports compared Angus steers from the Wye Angus herd finished either on grass or on grain, and analyzed the longissimus dorsi. It reported that eleven polyunsaturated fatty acids differed significantly between diets. Omega-3 fatty acids, including EPA, DPA and DHA, were higher in grass-finished beef. Several omega-6 fatty acids, among them linoleate and arachidonate, were higher in grain-finished beef. Total lipid in the muscle was generally higher in the grain-fed animals, and the authors summarized the results as a higher omega-3 to omega-6 ratio and lower total fat in grass-fed beef. The study was small, eight animals per group for the chemistry, and the specific concentrations are in the paper's tables, which you should consult directly if you need exact values.

The ratio everyone quotes

A 2022 review in Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems gives widely cited ratios of omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acids: about 1.53 to 1 for grass-fed beef and about 7.65 to 1 for grain-fed beef, citing earlier work. The review also notes that grass and clover forages carry alpha-linolenic acid, an omega-3, at roughly half to three quarters of their total fatty acids. Keep in mind that these ratios come from a review that pools results across studies and does not specify breed, so they describe a typical pattern rather than a guarantee for any particular Angus herd.

Why the diet shows up in the muscle

What cattle eat is what is available

Fresh forage is rich in omega-3 fatty acids, mostly alpha-linolenic acid. Grain rations, in contrast, are richer in omega-6 linoleic acid. These feeds supply the raw material the animal has to work with.

Rumen microbes change it on the way

Cattle are ruminants, and microbes in the rumen alter dietary fats before they reach the small intestine, partially saturating many of them. As a result, beef is never a simple mirror of the diet, and the proportions that end up in muscle depend on how long cattle are on a given feed, how much forage versus concentrate they eat, and how fast they grow.

Fat deposition changes the picture

Grain finishing generally promotes more intramuscular fat, the marbling that graders reward. Because total fat differs, the concentration of each fatty acid per gram of meat differs too. This is why researchers sometimes report fatty acids as a percentage of total fat and sometimes as milligrams per gram of meat, and why the two can tell different stories.

Why finishing duration and supplements matter

The Frontiers review argues that details of grass-fed programs, including supplementation and the timing of finishing, change the human health relevance of the beef. A pasture program that adds grain at the end, or one that finishes in late-season dormant forage, can look quite different from one that finishes on lush, growing pasture. If you are comparing two grass-fed products, they may not be equivalent. Farm.fm's page on pasture management for healthier Angus herds covers forage quality, and the ATTRA sustainable agriculture program publishes guidance on grass-finishing.

Limits of the evidence

  • Differences in fatty acid composition are not the same as differences in health outcomes, which require human studies.
  • Flavor, tenderness and consistency also change with finishing system, and customers do not all prefer the same profile.
  • Small sample sizes, different muscles, regions and breeds limit how far any single study can be generalized.

What this means for producers and shoppers

If you finish on pasture, you can accurately say that forage finishing is associated with a higher share of omega-3 fatty acids and a lower omega-6 to omega-3 ratio, and cite the published work. Stay away from claims that your beef treats or prevents disease. If you finish on grain, remember that marbling and eating quality are the strengths customers pay for. Shoppers deciding between the two should weigh their priorities: omega-3 share, flavor, price and cooking use. To find local producers of either, the agriculture directory can help.

Bottom line

Grass and grain finishing leave different fatty acid signatures in the longissimus dorsi of Angus beef. The direction of the difference is well supported, while the size of it depends on the program and the study. Verify current research and extension guidance before making marketing claims. This site is independent and not affiliated with the American Angus Association or Certified Angus Beef, whose resources are at angus.org.

More from this topic: Grass-Fed & Regenerative Angus → Grass-Fed Production